Showing posts with label Publications/Press and Events. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Publications/Press and Events. Show all posts

Thursday, August 10, 2017

"A cinema to be treasured in Mon State"

From FRONTIER MYANMAR July, 12th 2017

Myanmar's architectural treasures include an ornate teak cinema in Mudon that was built nearly 100 years ago and is probably unique in Southeast Asia.

Words and Photos by PHILIP JABLON

Myanmar’s reputation at Southeast Asia’s jewel box of heritage architecture is well established. From colonial-era masterpieces and rare examples of Tropical Art Deco, to vernacular architecture of every age, Myanmar likely contains the best-preserved collection of vintage buildings in all of mainland Southeast Asia.

Almost as well established is the precariousness of that status. Due to lax zoning regulations and weak enforcement of cultural heritage laws, many of Myanmar’s historic buildings stand in existential limbo, with market forces holding ultimate sway over their fate....

Click here for full article  

Scroll down for expanded photo essay.




The Aung Nan Mingala Cinema


A very simple ticket window. The smaller hole on the left was for the purchase of balcony level tickets.




The name of The Aung Nan Mingala Cinema on the gabled facade.


Auditorium views. The bare circles on either side of the screen once held paintings that were commissioned specially for the cinema.


The cartouche atop the proscenium, welcoming one and all to a world of escape.



Details of a balustrade surrounding the veranda.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Help support movie theater preservation

Feeling generous today? Want to contribute to the documentation of historic movie theaters in Southeast Asia? If so, please consider making a donation to The Southeast Asia Movie Theater Project. All donations between now and the end of the year will be used to survey more theaters in Myanmar, where enchanting gems like the one featured above are steadily being lost.






Every little bit helps me keep the project going.







Saturday, August 13, 2016

"Philly artist traces decay of Asian movie houses - and of his city's"

Last week The Philadelphia Inquirer ran a story about my latest exhibition "Forgotten in Plain Sight: Photographs of Southeast Asia's Vanishing Movie Theaters," now on display at PhilaMOCA until August 25th.

531 North 12th Street
Philadelphia, PA, USA

Click the images below to enlarge for reading






Philly Voice also covered the opening with an interview.




The demolition of the Boyd Theatre last year marked the end of an era for Philadelphia, erasing the last of Center City’s bygone movie palaces from the local landscape. Philly native Philip Jablon has witnessed a similar phenomenon taking place halfway around the world in Southeast Asia. Since 2009, Jablon has made it his mission to document the region’s disappearing stand-alone movie houses with the Southeast Asia Movie Theater Project, a photo blog where he posts images and observations about these vanishing cinemas. The project began as a distraction from several frustrated attempts to write his thesis while attending grad school at Chiang Mai University in Thailand, which has since become his home for much of the year. The hobby gradually evolved into his thesis and, from there, into a full-time focus; he now shows his photographs in gallery shows while writing advocacy pieces for local and international publications. This month, PhilaMOCA will exhibit “Forgotten in Plain Sight,” a selection of Jablon’s photographs. He talked about his curious passion project while back in Philly for the summer.


You earned a degree in Asian studies at Temple and went on to graduate studies in sustainable development in Thailand. How did you initially become interested in Asian culture?
It was really from cinema. The exact instance that really sent me on that path involves one of the last movie theaters here in Philadelphia. In about 1992, when I was 12 or 13, my dad took me to the Roxy, where they screened Jackie Chan’s 'Supercop.' It was a Chinese print with English subtitles, not dubbed, and this was before Jackie Chan made it big in the West. I was blown away. I specifically remember walking back through the streets of Philadelphia toward home, still amped up from this exciting action movie, and my dad saying to me, 'You know what’s great about a movie like this, son? It shows places in the world where people like you and I will probably never go.' And I was like, 'Oh, I’m going there, Dad.' That was a really influential experience.


How did your interest pivot from the movies to the theaters that showed them?
That was a little bit later. I started grad school there in 2006 and had gone through several thesis topics. As a way to dull the pain of the idea that maybe I wouldn't finish school, I started doing this side project photographing old cinemas. It wasn’t a planned thing. As a movie lover, I’d go watch movies in my free time. There were two cinemas that I was aware of in the city, and they were both on the top floors of these rather large shopping malls, which I always thought was kind of boring, but I figured that was just the way it was over there.
Then one day while riding my bike through town, I took a turn down a small alley and came across this old stand-alone movie theater. That really opened my eyes to this whole other facet of life and culture that had gone under my radar. A few months later, I went back and it had been demolished. That was the impetus. I made a conscious decision that if this is happening here in this city, I’m sure it’s happening elsewhere in the country and I’d like to make a record.

Is there a particular architectural style for these theaters? From what I’ve seen on your site, these buildings don’t resemble American-style movie palaces.
Architecturally, they vary from country to country. The vast majority of them were built in one variation of modern architecture or another. In the U.S., most of what we think of as the grand stand-alone movie theaters were built in the late teens up through the ’30s. With the exception of the art deco ones, we were building them in one form or another of pre-modern, European revivalist styles.
Whereas in Southeast Asia, the vast majority of those that are still in existence were built from the ’50s up through the early ’80s, depending on which country you’re in, and that point in time corresponded directly with very strong movements in modern architecture. So you’ve got some brutalism, some international style, some forms of tropical art deco, and some countries have their own unique language for theater architecture.
Burma has a particular style that I’ve informally dubbed 'Burmese polychromes.' It’s just a boxy façade, but there are these beautiful multi-colored patterns all across the front. So I’m trying to get it into the mind of the Burmese, 'Hey, look, you’ve got your own unique style of movie theater, this is something you should treasure a little bit more.' I’m trying to spur the preservationist sentiment.


How endangered are these theaters?
When I first started this project, there were still probably about 30 operating stand-alone movie theaters in Thailand. Now there are a grand total of four, not including a few theaters that are operating on the sly showing porn. There are literally entire regions of Thailand where the culture that was embodied by that form is completely gone.


Are the theaters and their styles reflective of the cultures or history in these countries?
If you look at when the theaters were built — in Thailand, for instance, you start to see a boom in development, including movie theaters, in 1961. That corresponds with the year that the U.S. set up military bases in Thailand because they were flying recon missions over Laos and Vietnam, who they were on the verge of getting into wars with. So the U.S. was sending military aid and economic development assistance in, and this was trickling down to society across the board.
The Motion Picture Association of America also had agents in Thailand and was bringing in films that expressed certain kinds of political messages, so it was very much part and parcel of the U.S. nation-building effort in that part of the world, trying to combat the spread of communism. At the same time, you had the development of indigenous film industries, so some theaters would specialize in Hollywood films while other theaters would specialize in Thai films or Burmese films. I’ve learned so much about how geopolitics actually works on the ground level in terms of cultural indoctrination and propaganda.

Do you feel like your work has had an impact?
Yes. I was actually just voted by Time Out Bangkok magazine as an 'expat we love.' Seven years ago, nobody cared about these buildings, and now there’s actually an active movement to revive select ones. It was really a rediscovery for a lot of people, particularly younger people. 

Monday, April 11, 2016

Theater of Dreams - By Jiradet Ophatpanwong

The following text was translated from Thai to English between March 27th and April 11th, 2016.
The original work is from a 28 year old Thai journalist, Mr. Jiradet Ophatpanwong, writing for A Day magazine. By all accounts, A Day is the most popular magazine for alternative content among 18 to 35 year-olds in Thailand.

I took some creative license with the translations, particularly when translating my own quotes. Because Thai is my second language and I am far from having native proficiency in it, many of the ideas I attempted to express were, by necessity, simplified. In the translation process, I often elaborated on those ideas, matching what I was trying to convey and would have said had my Thai been more advanced.

I hope you enjoy.

Phil
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Day 

- Issue 186. February 2016

ISSN 1513-6205

Theater of Dreams:

Dreaming of theaters in the real life world of Philip Jablon.


By Jiradet Ophatpanwong

If it weren't for modern day technology it's likely we'd have never met.

Without the advent of Facebook, chances are slim that I'd have ever come to know this particular American.

I learned of Philip Jablon because of his page "The Southeast Asia Movie Theater Project" - a depository of his photos of old stand-alone movie theaters from around Southeast Asia. He's been posting photos there, along with in-depth data associated with each theater, for years now. The data he collects comes to him the old fashioned way of going into the field and engaging with the people.

From the start of his project, six years ago, to the present, Philip Jablon has covered almost three-hundred stand-alone movie movies theaters in his travels around Southeast Asia. He counts tens of thousands of photos to his credit.

This past January, Philip opened an exhibition of his photographs of old Thai movie theaters at H Gallery, in Bangkok. In February, more of his photos were exhibited at the seminal Bangkok Edge Festival. For the latter he selected mostly photos of Myanmar theaters, with the sole Thai exception of the legendary Scala. The point of that, he claims, was to juxtapose the many historic movie theaters in Myanmar with the one left in Thailand and to communicate to a Thai audience the preciousness of our last remaining movie palace.

Admittedly, every time I gave my virtual praise to one or another of his photos through the mundane act of "liking" it, I would quietly ponder what motivated this sibylline American to stray so far from his home just to indulge his curiosity with our cinema halls. When the virtual world ceased to satisfy my own curiosity, I turned to the real world for answers by inviting him out for a chat at a location of his choosing.

It's not hard to guess which meeting place he chose.

I

"We'll get to soak up the atmosphere if we do it here," said Philip, in Thai, referring to the interview I was about to conduct. 

The 'here' he spoke of was the Scala Theater, the very location he suggested when I inboxed him. 

"The Scala is a special theater. Luxuriant. Spectacular in its architecture," he explained as we settled into the center of the grand, if time-worn hall. Philip's Thai is copacetic.

"If we talk about pure aesthetics, the Scala is absolutely the most beautiful theater in Southeast Asia. But beyond that, it's huge, it's in great condition and the architecture, well, again, it's simply stunning. Praiseworthy. Anybody who comes here would think so. I've never heard anybody express otherwise. In fact, every visitor I get I bring them to the Scala and they always say 'wow,' or 'this place is incredible.' An American guy I'm friends with told me that since he discovered the Scala, it's become his favorite place in Bangkok."

At the completion of that final sentence I rubbed my eyes and turned my gaze to the theater that the American had just praised.

There's no denying the beauty of the Scala. The architectural details that I saw before me were nothing short of impressive. But one undeniable fact stared me right in the face; an irrefutable sight that I was unable to overlook: The shabbiness left over from the passage of time. And that's to say nothing of the audio-video technology which, from our lobby vantage point, was beyond the scope of judgement.

But it was none other than him who said "Old places like this will necessarily meet their demise unless somebody gives it a second look, reevaluates it and takes action."

"Not just in Thailand. This type of situation exists everywhere. Technology changes, society changes and things from the past are impacted. If whatever it is isn't readapted to fit the new context it will become outmoded. It's inevitable. Think about this in terms of movie theaters. Nowadays everybody has a TV at home. Or a smartphone with video capability. It's absolutely not necessary to go to a movie theater to watch a movie.

"Another important factor is that many people now have cars. People have gotten used to driving everywhere for everything. The old fashioned movie theaters, like this one, didn't supply parking for their patrons, so their patrons stopped coming as parking became increasingly difficult. The theaters died as a result.

"That's a shame. These old theaters shine a light on our recent past," said Philip, with the last of its kind in the country all around him as proof.

The atmosphere surrounding us wasn't quite desolate, but it wan't exactly vibrant either. Ushers in their trademark yellow suit jackets did their duty on that afternoon just as they had for decades. One of many aspects of the Scala which reflects its connection to the past.




"You know what?" began Philip, beckoning my attention yet again. "If one day the Scala is torn down, Myanmar will be able to lay claim to the most elegant stand-alone movie theater in Southeast Asia."

II    

The site of our conversation stood tens of thousands of kilometers from his home town.

Philip was born in the city of Philadelphia, in the United States, when the city was at a low point.

"We're not an extremely wealthy city compared to others in America. It's a working class town, for the most part. But 30 or so years ago, when I was a little kid, Philly was in a bad state," explained Philip, recalling life in his home town. "Back in the 19th and early 20th century Philadelphia was extremely prosperous because of its role as America's largest industrial center. We manufactured everything. It was a mighty city back then. But following World War 2, our economy started to decline. Industry left the city for other places and the city steadily went into a depression.

"By the time I was born there were abandoned factories and warehouses all over the city. Unemployment was high, as was crime. Roughneck kids roamed the streets. It was a little intimidating growing up in Philly back then. You felt like you had to constantly be on guard. It was like 'what kind of nut am I going to run into today?' That was what it was like growing up in Philly when I did. It wasn't ideal by any means, with all the potential for violent encounters and street crime, but it definitely molded me."

There were times as a young man, Philip admitted, that he detested his home town. But over time he realized that those were just the sentiments of a young person with a narrow range of life experience.

"After returning from my first trip to Asia I saw [Philadelphia] with fresh eyes. I had become acutely aware of the changes there. What had gotten better. What hadn't gotten better. It was then that I really began to appreciate having grown up in Philadelphia when I did. At a time when Philly was truly down in the dumps. Before people wanted to live there. I'm glad I had that experience."

How growing up in a city full of unemployment, abandonment and crime could be a source of pride was perplexing, so I pressed him on the issue.

"It forced me to interact with a broad range of people from diverse backgrounds. We all had to live and study and work together in spite of our differences. To walk the same streets. There's a very human lesson in that. To admire the diversity and the different walks of life.They all have their good and bad points. Poor, middle, rich; they all have their sets of knowledge and expertise which they employ in the act of living. We've all got our own ways. I think there's something of value in that.

He continued:

"Humanity has many different sides to it, you know. If we take the perspectives of all different kinds of people we'll see a wider range of options before us. We'll see the strengths and weaknesses of each. I think diversity like this can help strengthen our imagination and creativity, things we need to live the lives that we aim for."

It was during this explanation that I first heard him use the word "diversity." He repeated this word many times during the course of our conversation, employing it in what seemed like each topic we covered, almost as though it were a mantra in which he had put all his faith.

"Diversity makes life interesting," Philip insisted to the journalist of a different nationality.

III

If a city plagued by societal ills was the dark side of Philip's memory of growing up in Philadelphia, then movie theaters were the upshot. 

As a young man, every week or so Philip's parents would take him to the movies in one or another of downtown Philadelphia's many stand-alone movie theaters.

"When I was young I didn't travel much beyond neighboring countries like Canada and Mexico. But around the age of 12 or 13, I first started getting interested in movies from Asia. That was a key point in my life, because those films showed locations which were so incredibly different from the world I was accustomed to. It was intriguing to a young person like I was at the time. It fired my imagination. I wanted to understand the places I saw. I wanted to understand Asia, the ways of life there.

"I remember one day my dad taking me to see the Jackie Chan movie 'Police Story 3: Supercop' in one of our downtown theaters. That was my first time seeing a Chan film and it blew me away. The action was amazing and the locations that they were shot it seemed so exotic to me. When we were walking back from the theater, through downtown Philadelphia, past all the shops lining the streets, and the people going about their business, I remember feeling extremely stimulated. That made a strong impact on me.

"During the walk my dad said to me 'What's great about watching a movie like that is it transports us to places we'd probably never get the chance to see in person.' And that was it! At that moment I decided that some day I would visit those places in person. I was going to explore Asia. Little did I know it would some day become my home."

Years passed. When he reached college age, Philip enrolled in a local university where he selected Kinesiology as his major, preparing for a career as physical education instructor. But after a few semesters he realized that it wasn't for him and he decided to change directions.

"Yeah, at first I thought I'd become a gym teacher for the simple reason that it offered a stable income and wasn't all that difficult. But the curriculum and my fellow classmates bored me. They were unimaginative dullards, if I have to speak truthfully. They all seemed to have a very bland, overly procedural outlook of life. 'First you do this and then you do this and bla bla bla.' Everybody was fixated on the straight ahead. Nobody seemed to have any other interests. At the time I was interested in having a diversity of experience. I wanted to get out of my comfort zone, so to speak.

"Life has got to have variety. This world benefits from it. It's of great import. It helps everybody to have a more rounded perspective of things. In fact, it strengthens society, I believe. Diversity. It's an important aspect of a society.

"You know what I dislike most about America? I hate our fascination with the suburbs. Why? Because there is absolutely no diversity therein. The residents there want it that way. How do you understand others if you sequester yourself away in environments such as that? There's no interaction among people of different demographics. It's fuckin' boring. I mean, I get it! I understand the logic of wanting to have complete control over every variable in life. But I don't think it's good. A bit of uncertainty is good. Don't get me wrong, it's good to be able to predict certain things, but life isn't like that. The world isn't necessarily like that."

He continued

"How do we know how the world is going to be? This year there's a drought, for example, next year there's floods. That's the way things work."

In other words, hold onto hope, but be prepared for unpredictability.

Following his brief aspiration of becoming a gym teacher, Philip's career goals became foggy. Combining his general interests in history and society, however, with his childhood curiosity in Asia, Philip embarked on a new academic trajectory in Asian Studies. And as a prerequisite for graduation, all Asian Studies majors were required to spend a semester studying in Asia.

The country he chose for his semester abroad was Thailand.

It was because of his uncle, who had served as a visiting professor at Mahidol University, that Philip came to know of our Land of Smiles.

"I had no clue about anything back then. I only knew that I wanted to go abroad and explore. To see Asia. I also held the belief that I could somehow help the people of Asia; the people of Thailand. But when I arrived there I realized that I was the one who needed help," said the American, laughing out loud at his youthful folly.

"When you read guidebooks on Thailand, what was it that you were most interested in seeing," I asked

"I wanted to see the great city of Bangkok, of course. Bangkok seemed to me like a bustling metropolis, crowded and exciting and full of energy. But I was also interested in seeing the lives of Hill Tribes and rural society."

Philip explained that the weak points of such guidebooks are that they only detail tourist sites and obvious landmarks, seaside resorts and mountain getaways,  but they generally fail to convey any insights into the real lives of locals.

"For instance, they don't ever mention places like this," said Philip, sweeping his gaze around the Scala.

"Nowhere does it say that Thailand has this increasingly rare, world class movie palace right in its heart. In fact, they never mention anything about the classic old movie theaters of this country."

IV

Philip completed his undergraduate studies in his home town, but he returned to Thailand for his Masters degree.

A Masters degree that he almost didn't complete.

Enthralled by the relaxed and diverse environment of Thailand, Philip moved to Bangkok, first trying his hand as an English teacher before deciding to get a Masters degree in Sustainable Development. He enrolled in a program at Chiang Mai University's Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development with the idea that he would subsequently go into the International Development field, revisiting again his desire to help improve conditions in Asia.

"To graduate I had to find an issue to write my thesis about. My first idea was to write it about the proliferation of gated suburban subdivisions. I was perplexed by the rapid growth of these communities on the outskirts of Chiang Mai and their negative impact on the environment. But it didn't take long before I lost interest in this topic. So I changed it to Microfinance, expecting to study organizations that extended small lines of credit to the rural poor. But when I started doing the research I soon realized that it didn't inspire me. So once again I changed my topic. This time I chose the resettlement of Burmese refugees. Philadelphia had become a destination for a growing number of refugees from Burma. The topic was really interesting, but again, the research didn't excite me. It was at that point that the idea of not completing my degree crossed my mind. I simply could not find a topic that I wanted to write a thesis about."

While mired in this academic impasse, Philip began to casually document old stand-alone movie theaters around Chiang Mai and other provinces. This, it turned out, was a research project that he had an unrequited fondness for, and undertook it irregardless of whether it would be a practical topic to research for a Masters thesis. Clearly there was no nexus between documenting old movie halls and a career in Sustainable Development.

"Then one day my thesis adviser said to me, 'Philip, you can make this your thesis topic. It's a topic which has never been adequately studied, and it does indeed relate to sustainable development. We typically focus our research on rural communities, of course, but this relates to urban communities. That's not outside of our purview at all.'

After getting the green light from his adviser, Philip picked up the intensity of his research, making a blog and Facebook page to track its progress. Thus began 'The Southeast Asia Movie Theater Project.'

"From the start I was aware that nobody was making a concerted effort to document these old movie theaters. So it seemed pretty logical that a good record of them could someday be a valuable resource. Again, thinking back to my childhood, I remembered spending many hours studying photo books of old Philadelphia. Seeing photos of Philadelphia at the peak of its economic prowess was very insightful to me. To see the beautiful buildings we once had and the numerous craftspeople and professionals who built and worked in them was an education in itself. Sometimes after examining those pictures I would say to myself, 'gee, I was really born in the wrong era. That looks much better.'

"I just applied the same logic to a Thai context. Without thorough documentation of Thai society, future generations won't be able to get that same experience that I had looking at old photographs of Philly. That was part of my rationale for undertaking the work. My way of 'helping' Thailand, I guess you can say"  

"The thesis topics I had initially chosen - urban sprawl, microcredit, refugee resettlement - while all interesting and worthwhile topics of study, didn't inspire me the way movie theaters do. They weren't topics that I felt eager to share. But old theaters, yes, that's a topic I discovered that I'm very passionate about."

Pausing momentarily on that theme, "How do passion and inspiration influence the work you're doing," I asked.

"No matter the nature of the work, if it's something I feel passionate about I'm happy to do it. And if there's a way to make a living out of it, all the better. That's the key. To balance the labor of love with labor of wages. Those who can figure out a way to satisfy both, now that's something special. Most people work jobs that they don't care much for, just to make ends meet. Not out of passion.

"If we've got work that we have passion for, it's as if we've won an award. Not an award like a trophy or anything like that but the award of life. Sure there might not be much monetary profit, but it makes life feel profitable. I feel that way about my work, I've gained a lot from it."



Philip and I sat in the very place we were discussing. 

Anybody who follows the news will know that the Scala Theater has received regular media coverage because of its precarious future in the face of demolition plans. Until now there has been no confirmation as to how much longer the grand old movie palace will be with us. 

Among the many Thai voices opposing the demolition proposal, a lone American has consistently voiced his own. His message has echoed across every possible medium that's accessible to him, be it an op-ed in a local newspaper, an essay on his personal blog or on his Southeast Asia Movie Theater Project Facebook page.

And not only the Scala. He has consistently championed the preservation of stand-alone movie theaters throughout the country. 

"Because every city should be as diverse as possible," he shot back, in response to my question as to why he's taken up the cause.

"And I'm not just talking about diversity in terms of people, though that's also important. I'm talking about diversity of buildings, of neighborhoods, of architecture. A city has to have variety! Okay, think of it like this: If you want to go watch a movie in a shopping mall, great, you've got that option. I'm not inherently against shopping malls and multiplexes. They clearly serve their purpose. But so do theaters like [the Scala]. Today I want to watch a movie in the theater in the shopping mall because it's convenient, it's climate controlled, I don't have to worry about looking for parking, etc. But other days I might want to go watch a movie in the stand-alone. I want to see interesting architecture, or to get that classic feeling that both my parents and grandparents experienced. If you want that option it's here, too. It's available. It's a real alternative. There's life here! It's got tremendous character. There's a direct connection to the public space of the street, you know? You might be strolling down the street and then glance up and there it is! A beautiful building staring you right in the face. This is extremely unique architecture."

"But if all you have are multiplex theaters in shopping malls, then Bangkok will have definitively lost some of its old dynamism. If it's only full of new buildings, it will be bland. If the Scala is allowed to be knocked down, Thailand will have arbitrarily conceded some of it's cultural dynamism. There are hardly any such theaters left in the entire country, and this is the finest example; the same one that has been delighting multiple generations. Coming here to watch a movie always leaves the movie-goer with a bit of the spirit of the place. It's a special place like that."

"So, you're saying that the destruction of an old building in order to clear space for something that is an improvement is a bad thing?" I asked, trying to better understand his perspective.

"Improvement? But are sure what's going to be built is an improvement?" he responded, purveying a new view for me.

"That all depends on how a given society views its past. Sure, by getting rid of older, seemingly outmoded buildings we have the chance to building things that are improvements for the space. But that doesn't usually translate into reality. Do you really think we build better nowadays? Let me give you a hypothetical example: The King's Palace. Can we knock it down to build something that's an improvement? Of course we can. But the existing palace has been around for generations and embodies a very important part of Thailand's identity. Nobody would even dare to think about tearing it down in order to build something newer or 'better' just because we have the technology and know-how to do so. Not for a second. So what we have to do is apply that kind of thinking to other structures. Sometimes holding on to what we already have just makes life better, you know? Things that have some history to them."

"Like you said, sometimes newer or more hi-tech does not equal better, right?" I probed.

"Absolutely not. We've got lots of great modern structures now. Some extremely modern designs. That's enough. Lets calm down for a second. If all we have are brand new shiny shopping malls the city won't be very interesting, will it? We'll probably start looking towards the past for inspiration, right? Maybe towards things which have helped us to build our identity. People have got to have some roots, and everybody must be able to feel those roots to one extent or another. To access them. The past relates directly to the present and this present will shape the future. All things are intertwined in that way. If we have nothing left from our past to really hold on to, nothing to feel or see, well I don't know what kind of society that would create. A society of rootless people, I guess."

He used a very fitting case study from his home town to further illustrate his point.

"Society cannot preserve everything. I'm not encouraging that. A city has to evolve continuously. But when it comes down to a city's last example of a given structure we have to preserve that. Philadelphia, my hometown, made that mistake already. Our final movie palace in the downtown area is in the process of being destroyed. Look, we can't hold on to every building that's got unique architecture or is beautifully designed. That's not realistic. But when we get to the point where there's only one of that thing left and we still go ahead and destroy it... Why? Now my fellow Philadelphians will never know that particular history. Never!"

"Boy is that a shameful thing! I literally feel ashamed for my city. The building they're replacing that movie theater with is a condo tower. That will make a ton of money for a very few investors, but the entire city of Philadelphia lost a huge piece of cultural capital. Hey look, I'm all for building new condos. I want Philly to build itself up again. But come on! Choose another plot of land! Don't destroy our culture so a few people can make a some money for themselves."

From what I could observe, it was a lack of patronage was killing the stand-alone movie theaters. "Do you think it's possible," I asked, "that all the outpouring of support is just talk? We say that we love these old theaters, but when it comes to actually supporting them, we show less interest."

"Sure, lots of people are like that. They see it in the press or on TV and they're like 'yes, the Scala should absolutely be preserved. It's important, it's beautiful, it should be off limits from demolition.' But then they end of going to watch movies in the shopping malls, because it's convenient, or because they're used to that. But really, if you want to show your love for the Scala, you've got to support it. You've got to come watch movies here. In English we say 'to put your money where your mouth is.' To be honest, that's the main reason that I've decided to continue this project. To keep reminding people of the Scala. Yeah, I've said it a number of times, 'preserve the Scala,' 'support it,' bla bla bla. Lots of people have come out one time to say preserve the Scala. But if we don't keep the advocacy up, people will simply forget."

"Is that because Thai people have short memories."

"No, it's not just Thai people. It's people at large. Most people are busy with their daily lives. Making a living, raising families. They don't spend time thinking about preserving old buildings, even if they are very fond of them. But if we can build a campaign around a place like the Scala and keep repeating, 'Scala is important,' "Scala is important,' 'Scala is important,' maybe it will eventually register. 'Oh Right," they'll conclude, "the Scala really is important.'

VI

For Philip, passion is the driving force behind his work, in the same way, as he admits, that money is the driving force behind what happens to the Scala.

It's no secret that equipment like cameras and lenses don't grow from the ground. Nor do airplane tickets fall from the heavens. Such things must be acquired with the exchange of sizable sums of money. When without sponsorship, the onus of funding his project comes from his own hard work.

Philip used his personal savings to get the project going before being awarded a grant from the Bangkok-based Jim Thompson Foundation, which recognized the value in the undertaking. The duration and extent of the grant, however, covered only a portion of Philip's ambitious goal. He has since raised some funds to continue the project by self-publishing a limited edition photo portfolio which he sells through his web-site. But proceeds from that only go so far.

While explaining how he has managed to keep his project afloat for these past 7 years, I thought back to our first communication via the cyber world. That same day he wrote back saying that he was in the US, but would be returning to Thailand in another six weeks.

Is it only me who would presume Philip's America trip was just a normal hometown visit?

"Actually, I usually go back to Philly every year for about 5 months to earn a living. I work for a moving company. Every time I go back home that's what I do. That work requires one to be physically fit. If you're not strong and in good shape, you won't be able to do it. We lift heavy things. You also have to be mentally strong to do this work, because lots of people look down on moving as a profession."

"Do you care what others think>" I inquired.

"I used to care, but not so much anymore. I understand exactly why I do this work and it's not because I have any great love for it. The money I make from it goes to support the project - something that I do love. My goal is to continue documenting the stand-alone movie theaters of Southeast Asia. My job in Philadelphia allows me the flexibility I need to do that."

Once the moving season slows down and his earnings are sufficient he returns to Thailand to continue documenting our old cinemas.

At this point, a good portion of his life has been spent traveling throughout Thailand and our neighboring countries for his project.

Now, if we were to examine this scenario in cut and dry terms, we would expect to see this 36 year old man with an advanced education working as a mid-career professional, building savings, owning a home, a car and raising a family. But life for people who follow their passions doesn't always work out that way. Aside from his parent's home in the US and his condo in Chiang Mai, Philip has excused himself from most other trappings (or benefits?) of standard career person.

"Over time I've gotten used to the lifestyle. Being unsure of whether or not I'll ever make a proper livelihood. But it's all of my own choosing, so I fully accept where I am. I can't claim it has anything to do with my upbringing, or my schooling. I made all my own choices. I accept all risks."

"I'd be lying, however, if I said I didn't worry. You know, I like this work more than anything else I've done in my life. But is it possible to support myself from it? I'm not getting any younger. In just over 3 years I'll be 40 years old. To be 40 and to not have anything. Well, I have some things, but not a whole lot. That's what happens, I suppose, when one sets out on uncharted waters."

"It's the encouragement that I get from so many followers that keeps me moving forward, though. People saying, 'Keep going, Philip. Go ahead. You'll get there. Just keep on building your name and you'll find the support you need.' Regardless of all that, I know that if my efforts to raise the profile of old movie theaters in Southeast Asia succeed; if I can convince people to think differently about these wonderful structures, then my work has been worthwhile."

"Hopefully I'll get some credit for that, but nothing is guaranteed."

VII

At the end of February, Philip will embark on a month-long work trip to Myanmar, traveling throughout the country to document stand-alone movie theaters. He intends to visit a different city every day.

For Philip, there is an urgency to this mission.

"I really need to return to Myanmar because the country is opening up [to foreign investment] and society is going to change rapidly. It's going to start adapting to new economic and political circumstances. There will be great things to come out of all that, like poverty alleviation efforts, along with rising living standards in general. But there will be unfortunate side effects to it as well. As money pours into the country lots of things are likely to be overlooked. For instance, I imagine if the shopping mall syndrome comes into play, with their cookie-cutter multiplex theaters, many people in Myanmar will welcome it as a sign of consumer progress. I think that's a pretty typical phenomenon when transitioning from a closed to an open society. At the same time, very few people will be thinking about preserving their old stand-alone movie theaters."

He gave an example of an area in downtown Yangon which until a few years ago had 6 movie theaters in a row. Such an agglomeration of grand old movie palaces, he explained, reflected a golden age of movie-going. Now, just a few years later, only 2 of the 6 remain.

"Myanmar still has a about ten luxurious old movie palaces from 60 or so years ago, I reckon. Most of them are in pretty good condition. There are also other stand-alone movie theaters that I wouldn't necessarily classify as movie palaces. If I'm able to document all that's left, I believe that I'll have created a very valuable record. Future generations will be able to see at least a portion of their once vast inventory of stand-alone movie theaters. That represents a lot of very interesting architecture. It will also encourage people in Myanmar to evaluate what is currently in existence and what should be held on to."

The American photographer with a fondness for Southeast Asia admitted that at present he is more concerned with Myanmar than Thailand.

The concern lies in the pending wave of development, which has the potential to wipe out a wide array of artifacts, antique movie theaters among them.

"Right now, Myanmar is like Thailand was 30 or 40 years ago. The cities are quaint. Full of old buildings. There's no expressways or sky trains. Relatively few people own cars. Most transportation is still done by bicycle or foot in the majority of towns. Things are basically local. All the cities have a very distinct identity. But if the country is intent on getting richer, on developing, these things will start to disappear. I believe Thailand has attained a high level of modernity already. It's actually to the point where people are starting to look towards the past. Looking back towards things that had value but were lost. Things that had social value. Things which Myanmar is going to start overlooking"

"When you go to Myanmar, is there any particular place that you really want to photograph?" I asked.

"Yes, there's one place I definitely want to document. The last time I was there I wasn't allowed to photograph the interior. But this time I think I'll be able to. I have a few Myanmar friends who said they think they can help me get access. I hope I can get in. It's gorgeous inside!"

I tried to imagine what he was referring to, but wasn't able. Which theater could he have been talking about?

"It's the theater I told you about before. The one that, if Thailand loses the Scala, will be the most beautiful movie palace in Southeast Asia."

As his sentence came to an end it all came back to me.

IIX

There was one question that begged further inquiry: Having the profound love for the old style movie theater that he does, did their destruction pain him? 

Or did he understand that their destruction is a pretty normal occurrence? Natural even?

"Both," Philip said. "In the case of Bangkok, for example, there were somewhere around 200 stand-alone movie theaters throughout the city over the years. As time went by society changed and those theaters began to fall. A very natural order of events for a thriving city. Cities need to develop. They can't stay frozen in the same condition for all time. On the other hand, however, I do feel a bit sad when they go, because they hold so much history for the communities they served. They were very important to their communities. So yes, I feel bad, but that's just how the world works."

"It's kind of like humans. Someday your beloved grandparents and parents are going to pass away. It's a guarantee. Yes, it will be sad, yes, you will feel a loss, but it's natural."

"What about when you look through the photos you've taken? How does it make you feel?" I asked.

"For many of them, I look back and I'm so glad that I took them when I did. A lot of [the theaters] have since been destroyed. Just yesterday, in fact, somebody in Myanmar Facebook shared my photo of The Win Cinema in the city of Toungoo. I photographed that theater about 6 years ago, but it's since been demolished. After it was shared, lots of people in Myanmar commented on it, expressing their memories and things like that. I feel lucky that I had the chance to document that place. For the people in that town it was something that they saw on a daily basis and took for granted until one day it wasn't there any more. Erased. But when they saw the photo I took of it, they were reminded of it. It took them back."


The Win Cinema - Toungoo, Myanmar. Since demolished.

"Would you say that it's common for us to overlook things that are close at hand?" I asked.

"Absolutely. I think it's a sign of being human," said Philip, with a sardonic smile across his face.

His photos aside, the conversation that that had transpired made me think back to the movie theaters of my youth, which had slowly become little more than dim memories.

As we stood up to leave, I asked him why he hadn't brought his camera with him, "Actually, I don't really like taking pictures," he admitted.

It suddenly all became clear. Had that sentence not come from the mouth of the man who has wandered around and taken tens of thousands of photographs of old movie theaters, I'd have never gotten the information necessary to conclude this story.

Where there's a will there's a way.

"Photography is work. It's a burden. It's not easy. But my objective is to show that there is value in old movie theaters, and I don't know a better way to express this. It's our best option for achieving that. Photographs, sketches, film. As records they are better than memories, because memories die with their owner. Photos, they last.

"They are memories that people can see."


 

 






Monday, July 13, 2015

Reviving old movie theaters (in Thailand): A panel discussion

This coming Saturday, July 18th, at 3:00PM the Thai Film Archive will be hosting a panel discussion on the revival of stand-alone movie theaters in Thailand. The discussants, myself and architectural preservationist Rungsima Kullapat, will be talking about the on-going renovations to Bangkok's historic Nang Loeng Cinema, and the prospects for further stand-alone movie theater revivals in Thailand.

The talk will be held at the Sri Salaya Theater of the Thai Film Archive, in Salaya town, Nakorn Pathom Province, Thailand (of course).

It is open to the public. The invitation card below, however, is only in Thai.


Monday, March 9, 2015

SEAMTP on Thai Channel 11

A little help spreading the preservationist message from Thailand's Channel 11:

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Talking movie theaters at TEDx Chiang Mai

On September 27th I gave a presentation about Southeast Asia's stand-alone movie theaters at TEDx Chiang Mai. The video is now available on Youtube and below.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Theatre of Dreams in the Northern Capital

As published in the Bangkok Post
October 14th, 2014


Promises of an exotic cultural experience amid the street-side hawkers of historic Chang Klan Road, home of Chiang Mai’s Night Bazaar, fall well short of expectations. Today, the scene among this shopping zone differs little from a half dozen such sites across the country. For a growing city which relies heavily on its unique historic identity as a main selling point, Chiang Mai’s Night Bazaar leaves much to be desired.

But the promised intrigue of the Night Bazaar is not without historic precedent. At the street’s southeast corner, a relic of Chang Klan Road’s storied past stands obscured from view beneath a veil of visually polluting vinyl billboards. If those adverts were ever peeled back the Night Bazaar would get a peek at the Saeng Tawan Theatre, Chiang Mai’s grandest ever movie theatre.

Built in 1978 – at the tail end of Thailand’s mid-century movie palace construction boom – the Saeng Tawan was the fourth and final movie theatre contracted by Chao Chaisuriwongse na Chiang Mai, a descendant of Chiang Mai’s royal household who fashioned himself into the city’s primary cinema benefactor. Chao Chaisuriwongse commissioned the Saeng Tawan to be the most luxurious of his quartet of theatres, all of which were located to the east of the old city walls.

The site chosen for the Saeng Tawan was the 4-way junction of Chang Klan and Sri Donchai roads, today marking the informal southern boundary of the Night Bazaar area. Local architect Aj. Chulathat Kitibutr, now internationally known for combining the best of traditional Thai architecture with the comforts of modernism, was contracted for the design.

Aj. Chulathat faced the Saeng Tawan at a 45 degree angle to the intersection. Doing so allowed the theater’s elegant façade, featuring an intricate terracotta tile mosaic depicting Chiang Mai’s history, to be seen clearly from the two bisecting streets. Upon completion the Saeng Tawan Theatre became a figurative masthead of the upper Chang Klan Road corridor

Like the majority of stand-alone movie theatres in Thailand, if not the world over, the waning years of the 20th century were not kind to the Saeng Tawan. A proliferation of home entertainment systems – TV’s, VCR’s, and karaoke machines –  combined with an increase in car ownership among locals, made trips to a pedestrian-oriented movie theater that didn’t provide much parking less appealing, if not altogether inconvenient.

By the late 1990’s, Chiang Mai had become home to two sizable shopping malls, both of which were able to attract the city’s auto-centric consumer base with secured parking garages. Once inside, shoppers had the added option of seeing a movie at the seven-screen multiplex theatre that accompanied each of the newfangled malls.

And that marked the death of the Saeng Tawan.

When the ailing picture palace’s contract expired in the early aughts, the owners never bothered to renew it. The dormant Saeng Tawan has served several less glamourous functions over the subsequent decade and a half – from restaurant to snooker hall, and most recently a warehouse for a company that prints billboards.

The fall of the Saeng Tawan ushered in a gradual decline of the Night Bazaar and upper Chang Klan Road in general. Lacking a genuine anchor institution, the area is facing its first real cultural deficit since it gained its “exotic” reputation decades before.

“Back then, Chang Klan Road was different from now” recalled Ms. Trasvin Jittidecharak, owner of Silkworm Books and lifelong Chiang Mai resident. “The first Night Bazaar was…just an ordinary street market. It was a real tourist attraction. The 3-storey [high] Chiang Mai Night Bazaar [building] was built much later, during the tourism boom of the 80s. It was more authentic in the past.”

Indeed, Chang Klan Road was well known for its eclectic cultural mix well before the Saeng Tawan was ever built. The designation of the area as “Night Bazaar,” in fact, was not without good reason: For decades this stretch of city was home to ethnically non-Thai settlers. Moslem Hor Chinese, many of whom were descendants of caravan traders who forged trade routes that linked China’s Yunnan Province to the northern Thai principalities, made their homes along upper Chang Klan. An Indo-Pakistani community grew there, as well, attracted by the city’s welcoming social climate and growing commercial opportunities. The original “Night Bazaar” was the market that these traders held every evening.

Within this melting-pot atmosphere, Chiang Mai’s first ever permanent movie theater – The Patthanakorn Theatre – came into existence on Chang Klan Road in 1923, one year after the State Railway of Thailand made Chiang Mai its northern terminus. Completion of the railroad made the transportation of film reels from Bangkok a rapid and regular occurrence, precipitating the rise of a movie exhibition industry.

Over time, the Patthanakorn was supplanted in popularity by other Chiang Mai movie theaters, including the much newer Saeng Tawan. But as Chiang Mai’s debut picture hall, it helped to solidify the reputation of upper Chang Klan Road as an important cultural center.

Throughout Thailand in general, the once popular pastime of movie-going in grand stand-alone movie theatres like the Saeng Tawan is dangerously close to being completely lost. Cities around the world, however, are finding that the restoration of such movie theaters can serve as growth engines for broader economic development goals. In New York, for instance, the city government is covering half the 92-million dollar cost for the renovation of the 84 year old Loew’s King’s Theater on those exact principles. Closer to Thailand, neighboring countries like Singapore, Malaysia and Burma are taking action to preserve some of their own picture palaces for use as film and concert venues.

Meanwhile, in Thailand, old movie theaters are treated like yesterday’s garbage, with little attention given to readapting them for contemporary audiences.

Although it will take nothing short of a visionary developer to execute the Saeng Tawan’s restoration to world standards, doing so would endow Chiang Mai with an exciting piece of cultural infrastructure which would go a long way towards helping the city grow sustainably. And for a neighborhood flush with history, in a city which markets itself on its well preserved past, restoring the Saeng Tawan Theatre would be the perfect compliment.

In the meantime, it’s still fun to dream.


Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Burma's Silver Screens

My article on Burma's Silver Screens was published in the Democratic Voice of Burma on Sept. 14th, 2014. 


The architectural milieu found in most Burmese cities dates primarily to the mid and early 20th centuries, making it an infrastructural anomaly among its Asean neighbors. This aging-but-architecturally-significant stock of buildings can largely be attributed to the country’s economic isolation over most of the last 25 years. The forces of globalization, in contrast, have led to the constant replacement of aging, “outmoded” structures in most other Asean countries.  

The Waziya Cinema is to undergo renovations
One structure which has endured at a particularly high rate in Burma is the stand-alone movie theater. While stand-alone cinemas in the advanced economies of Southeast Asia have typically found survival under the modernization regime almost impossible, Burmese cinemas have lingered on, even in the face of dwindling attendance. 
Loosening investment policy towards Burma, however, will likely expose these theaters to the whims of the market, where without renewed interest or legal protection, land pressures and lucrative property deals will invariably lead to their destruction. In general, stand-alone movie theaters are one of the first structures to go when redevelopment initiatives are enacted. The large plots they usually occupy make them prime targets in the eyes of developers.

Movie-goers assemble in the lobby of the Nay Pyi Daw Cinema - Mandalay 
Indeed, as this story goes to press, Burmese cinemas are under the greatest duress they have encountered since they became targets for aerial bombardment during World War II. But aside from the buildings themselves, under threat is a unique history which is intimately entwined with that most dynamic of artistic mediums – cinema.The Burmese film industry was once one of Southeast Asia’s most prodigious. In its golden years the creative forces at Rangoon-based studios such as A1, British Burma, New Burma and others churned out thousands of hours worth of celluloid entertainment to meet the needs of a transforming nation.
To accommodate the movie boom, developers, exhibitors and the studios themselves financed the construction of evermore luxurious stand-alone movie theaters.
Between independence from Great Britain in 1947 and the 1962 coup, these temples to cinema were built in record numbers throughout the country. Burma’s staunch position in the Cold War-era Non-Aligned Movement, moreover, ensured that local cinemas were not dominated by films from any one particular country or political alignment, as was common among countries beholden to a single superpower. Burmese theaters instead screened movies from a diverse array of countries, replete with a medley of political messages.

Looking straight down upon movie-goers at the Tun Thiri Cinema - Pyay 
Domestic productions aside, a trip to a cinema hall in the 1950’s could have been spent watching a film from India, China, the Soviet  Union, Singapore, Japan, Britain or, of course, the standard Hollywood fare.This celluloid cosmopolitanism expanded the viewing market. The result was that downtown Rangoon, then the Burmese capitol as well as largest city, became home to a concentration of movie theaters that was unrivaled in Southeast Asia.
Then as it still is today, Rangoon’s movie theater district was centered at the intersection of Sule Pagoda and Bogyoke Aung San roads. At its peak, fourteen cinemas flanked the streets in all 4 directions from that junction alone. Other sections of the city had their own theaters.
Confidence in a prosperous future was high throughout Burma heading in to the 1960’s - a fact evidenced by an increase in construction of all kinds. Cinema design developed into a specialty discipline, as architects combined broader trends in the modern architecture movement with a distinctly Burmese flair.

Arguably Burma's most elegant existing movie theater, the Thamada 
One such design popularized during the period was the “Burmese Polychrome” – one of several iterations of the International Style with a Burmese twist. These theaters feature boxy, quadrangled facades, textured by the use of polychromatic checker patterns. The color variation is achieved through either paint or tile.
Polychromes of Burma

 

The Shae Saung Cinema - Yangon


The Thida Cinema - Yangon 
The few existing theaters which predate the second World War were elaborate undertakings done in the  Beaux Arts style. Examples of such theaters can be found in the Yangon’s still-active Waziya Cinema and the defunct Cathay Cinema.

The Cathay Cinema - now a rug store.
But the most common architectural form used in Burmese cinema design was Art Deco. The classical symmetry of Burmese Art Deco theaters, often culminating in a central spire, became a distinct physical feature of mid-century urban Burma. If a Burmese city had a movie theater, chances are it was designed in the Art Deco tradition.
Art Deco cinemas of Burma

 

The Tun Thiri Cinema - Pyay


The Win Cinema - Toungoo


The Khemarat Cinema - Keng Tung
Following the 1962 military coup, the architectural evolution of the movie theater in Burma ceased. Soon after their rise to power, General Ne Win’s government nationalized all movie theaters, putting them under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Information. From then onwards the few theaters built in the country were state undertakings. In 1984 the Ministry of Construction financed the first of three new theaters in Mandalay – the Myo Gon Yaung – followed by the Myoma and the Nay Pyi Daw. Another, the Nawaday Cinema Garden, was built in Yangon in 1990.

The government-built Myo Gon Yaung Cinema - Mandalay 


The Myoma Cinema, built by the government in 1998
In January 1995, the central government established the Myanmar Privatization Commission (MPC) as a means of selling off some of the nearly 1,800 state-owned enterprises. From its start in 1995 up until 2001, a mere 138 state-enterprises were unloaded, and of those 138, an astounding 87 of them movie theaters.  This statistic has less to do with the investment potential of the cinema business itself as it does the value of the land that cinemas occupy.
Ironically, the stunted pace of development that afflicted Burma for over half a century had a time capsule effect on its cities. Instead of experiencing the large scale restructuring of urban space to accommodate modern industry and its bedfellow, mass consumption – led by the space-requisite automobile – Burmese town and city cores remained comparatively unchanged from their pre-coup conditions. The lack of financial resources to build anew ensured that aging architecture endured, if only out of necessity.
Since Burmese president Thein Sein began the political reform process in 2011, thereby setting the stage for global capital inflows, the country’s stand-alone movie theaters have predictably come under duress. The once vibrant epicenter of movie-going in Rangoon lost four of its remaining nine theaters within a year of reforms. Dozens more have closed their doors across the country, with the spectre of further demolitions steadily on the rise.  And as the number of flashy new multiplex theaters in the country continues to rise, Burma’s stock of ailing stand-alone cinemas will only suffer further.

Security at the Shwe Mann Cinema - Yangon 
Fortunately, there are those in Burma who recognize that good old architecture – movie theater or otherwise – can be an asset worth preserving, rather than a pariah in need of replacement. Leading that charge is the Yangon Heritage Trust – an architectural and cultural heritage advocacy organization established by Dr. Thant Myint Oo. In cooperation with the Myanmar Motion Picture Association, an NGO representing the domestic film industry, they have set a vision for the renovation of the historic Waziya Cinema on Bogyoke Aung San Rd. This will mark the first movie theater preservation initiative in Burma, and one of only a few in all of Southeast Asia.